Malliṣeṇa
-
The Cārvākas and The Jains: An Overview
Ramkrishna Bhattacharya explores the complex historical relationship between Cārvāka materialists and Jain philosophers. Although both rejected Vedic authority and ritual sacrifice, Jain writers branded Cārvākas as nāstika for denying rebirth. Crucially, Jain canonical texts, commentaries, and compendia preserved vital fragments, aphorisms, and lost commentators of the Cārvākasūtra, safeguarding Indian materialist history.
-
Hemacandra and the Misunderstanding of Cārvāka Inference
This analysis reveals how Jain scholar Hemacandra and commentator Malliṣeṇa misrepresented Cārvāka epistemology by ignoring commentarial literature. Contrary to their claim that Cārvākas rejected all inference, commentators like Purandara, Aviddhakarṇa, and Udbhaṭa affirmed empirical inference for daily life while rejecting its use for unobservable, supernatural entities like heaven or karma.