Purandara
-
Lectures on the Cārvāka/Lokāyata (Part II) :
Some Common Misrepresentations ExaminedThis lecture refutes common misconceptions surrounding Cārvāka/Lokāyata philosophy. It demonstrates that Cārvākas did not reject inference entirely, but accepted empirical reasoning while rejecting transcendent claims. Furthermore, it dispels the caricature of Cārvākas as unrestrained sensualists, showing that orthodox critics misrepresented their rejection of asceticism and ritualism as moral depravity.
-
Hemacandra and the Misunderstanding of Cārvāka Inference
This analysis reveals how Jain scholar Hemacandra and commentator Malliṣeṇa misrepresented Cārvāka epistemology by ignoring commentarial literature. Contrary to their claim that Cārvākas rejected all inference, commentators like Purandara, Aviddhakarṇa, and Udbhaṭa affirmed empirical inference for daily life while rejecting its use for unobservable, supernatural entities like heaven or karma.
-
The Ontology and Epistemology of the Cārvāka/Lokāyata
Ramakrishna Bhattacharya outlines Cārvāka four-elemental ontology and perception-based epistemology, examining how commentators defended these views. While Purandara and Aviddhakarṇa affirmed empirical inference, revisionists like Udbhaṭa introduced Nyāya categories and dualism. Bhattacharya argues that forced glosses moving away from the author’s original intent represent hermeneutical inconsistencies rather than genuine internal development.
-
Cārvāka/ Lokāyata: Some Common Misrepresentations Examined
This lecture refutes common misconceptions surrounding Cārvāka/Lokāyata philosophy. It demonstrates that Cārvākas did not reject inference entirely, but accepted empirical reasoning while rejecting transcendent claims. Furthermore, it dispels the caricature of Cārvākas as unrestrained sensualists, showing that orthodox critics misrepresented their rejection of asceticism and ritualism as moral depravity.